| Project Guidelines |
|
During the semester, design teams are expected to consider
engineering standards and realistic constraints similar to
real-world considerations engineers would have when
developing a new product. These considerations include:
- Economic aspects, including cost of parts and
manufacturing, as well as potential marketability of the
system
- Environmental impact of manufacturing and using the
system
-
Sustainability:
- Are system parts available from more than one
vendor?
- What maintenance and support will the product
require?
-
Manufacturability
- What is the effect of component tolerances on
system performance?
- Worst-case analysis, expected production
yield
- Testability
- Compliance to regulations (FCC, etc.)
-
Safety
- Safety in the workspace
- System safety issues: no user access to
voltages >50V, compliance to regulations
(UL)
- Impact on society
It is expected that teams will address these
considerations in their PDR, CDR, and the final project
report.
|
| Weekly Reports |
|
Every Monday beginning the fifth week of class (see schedule), a half-page progress
report from each student will be sent to the instructor and
TA's via email by 5:00 p.m. Send the report as text in the body of an email.
Do NOT send it as an attachment! Also, please include your team name in the subject line.
These weekly progress reports
should continue until the end of the semester. The purpose of
the weekly reports is to keep track of the progress and to
facilitate better communication among the team members and
the instructors. Active participation in the weekly reports
will contribute to the "individual effort" portion of the
final grade.
The report's format is up to you, but the content should address the following:
-
Summarize what you did this week, with a few
sentences or bullets. This should include:
- Any unresolved problems
- Summary of communication and joint work
performed with other members of the team
- Plan of work for the next week
- Include a simple "time card" stating the date and
approximately the number of hours you spent individually
on lab-related work. Also indicate the date and number of
hours you spent on lab-related work with other members of
the team.
- Summarize your progress towards the next milestone in
your schedule. This should include reasons for any
discrepancies between actual progress and plan.
- You may also wish to ask for help, or to state any
concerns or questions you have for the instructors.
The answers should be short but concrete (overly terse
answers such as "the construction went on as scheduled, and
no delays are expected " are not acceptable).
|
| Preliminary Design Review
(PDR) |
-
Requirements:
- Prepare your PDR presentation in PowerPoint
form and provide a copy of the presentation and
any supporting data/information on a Readable
only CD (CD-R). This should be provided to the
instructor at the time of your presentation.
Should you not have access to CD-R's or
facilities, please see the course
instructor.
- Bring hard copies of the Presentation and a
preliminary version of the User's Manual to the
meeting. Make copies for the instructor, as
well as both TA's.
- All members of the team are expected to take
an active role in the presentation.
- The presentation should not take more than 30
minutes and is expected to be professional, and
rehearsed.
-
PDR presentation and preliminary version of
the user manual:
-
The main objectives of the PDR are to:
- Propose and present the project
- Convince the audience of its
feasibility within the constraints of
time, effort, and materials
- Demonstrate that the project has
appropriate complexity.
-
Therefore, the PDR Presentation should
address at least the following:
- Project objectives and purpose of
the system: describe the goals and
function of the project in clear, precise
terms. Be as specific as possible. It is
a good idea to present a set of baseline
objectives plus possible extensions.
Eschew garrulous, ostentatious and
superlative language.
- Outline of the approach: block
diagrams with explanation of
functionality and input/output interface
between various (hardware and software)
sub-systems. You should have some
preliminary ideas of how to realize the
circuitry of each block.
- Implementation of the various
sub-systems: discuss how various
parts are going to be realized, giving
possible alternatives. Again, be as
specific as possible.
- Division of labor and
responsibilities: who is going to do
what?
- Schedule: give a detailed plan
of how the project will be completed
through the end of the semester. The plan
and associated tasks should be related
directly to project milestones, i.e. PDR,
CDR, Milestone I, Milestone II,
EXPO,etc..
- Risks and contingency plan:
identify areas of risk (e.g., schedule
uncertainty, availability of components,
unfamiliar technology, questionable
feasibility) and plans to recover from
such adverse events.
-
The preliminary version of the User's Manual
should answer the following questions:
- What does the system do?
- What does it look like?
- How is it used?
-
Grading:
- The PDR accounts for 10% of the final grade.
-
Examples of PDR presentations.
|
| Critical Design Review (CDR) |
-
Requirements:
- Prepare your CDR presentation in PowerPoint
form and provide a copy of the presentation and
any supporting data/information on a Readable
only CD (CD-R). This should be provided to the
instructor at the time of your presentation.
Should you not have access to CD-Rs or
facilities, please see the course
instructor.
- Bring hard copies of the Presentation
to the
meeting. Make copies for the instructor, as well
as both TA's.
- All members of the team are expected to take
an active role in the presentation.
- The presentation should not take more than 30
minutes and is expected to be professional, and
rehearsed.
-
CDR presentation:
-
The main objective of the CDR is to present
the complete design of the system and to
describe how the system is going to be
implemented. Therefore, the CDR Presentation
will include:
- A system block diagram with a
functional description of parts and
interfaces
- Complete specifications and detailed
design of each subassembly, including
circuit and logic diagrams, labeled
parts, interfaces and pinouts, timing
diagrams and waveforms
- Description of software processes
with their inputs and outputs
- Test results and demo of completed
parts of the system (if any)
- Parts list
- Updated detailed schedule with
planned deliverables for Milestone 1,
Milestone 2, and the final Open-Lab
Expo.
- Updated division of labor and
responsibilities: who is going to do
what?
-
Grading:
- CDR accounts for 10% of the final grade.
-
Examples of CDR presentations
|
| Capstone End-of-Semester Expo |
-
Deliverables:
The following items must be handed to Tom or the TAs on Thursday, by the end of Expo (noon). It is your responsibility to make sure that we get them on time. We will not go around and collect them.
- Technical Reference Manual:
This manual should be bound in such a way that it will lay flat when opened (spiral or comb bound are fine). The front cover must contain, at minimum, (1) your group name, (2) the names of all group members, and (3) the semester/year (e.g. Fall 2005). Pictures on the cover are a nice addition but are not necessary.
This report should include a title page, abstract, purpose of the project, detailed description of the system and its components, together with block and detailed schematic diagrams, software listings (code), measurement results and conclusions. If you use any 'exotic' parts, please include datasheets for them. Long datasheets do not need to be printed in full -- the first few pages are enough -- but include a full copy on your CD (see below). Please try to save paper -- print double-sided if appropriate.
Think of it this way: if you hand someone this manual, they should be able to build an exact copy of your project.
- User's Manual:
Binding and front cover requirements are the same as for the Technical Manual. The User's Manual should explain how to use your project, including how to set it up. If you give someone your completed project and a copy of this manual, they should be able to operate your project correctly.
- Critiques:
Each person is required to submit a critique of the performance of
each of the members of their team, INCLUDING themselves. They should also
assign a grade to each member (A,A-,B+,B,B-,etc.), INCLUDING themselves.
Critiques must be in hardcopy. Email is not acceptable. No critique, No Grade.
To ensure confidentiality critiques may be stapled, taped, put in a
sealed envelope, etc. Critiques will be seen by the instructor(s) only. These critiques constitute 10% of each student's grade, and as such, should be honest and objective.
- CD-R:
We need a CD-R (no CD-RWs please) from each group containing all code,
schematics, drawings, manuals, documentation, etc. This helps a lot when people need to get a copy of project information a few months from now. Please mark the CD with group name and Semester/Year.
- Other Requirements/Suggestions:
- Checkout Appointment:
Each team must make an appointment with class TAs in order to return any equipment, parts, etc. that may have been checked out or borrowed. A sign-up sheet will be posted. This must get done before the end of Expo.
- E-Stores Account:
Don't forget to pay this off! Failure to do this can result in a grade of INCOMPLETE for all members of the team.
- Display Board:
Each group must have some sort of display for their project. The tri-fold kind (science fair style) seem to work well. Try to use the display to help people understand the project. Lots of text is usually bad because nobody will stand there and read it all, but diagrams and pictures can be helpful.
- Demo/Explanation:
You will have to explain your project dozens of times. It is in your best interest to come up with a clear, concise (30-second) verbal introduction to your project. An interesting demo of your project is also a good thing to think about: a simple project with a good demo will impress people more than a complex project with a bad demo.
|
|